Activating BRAF and N-Ras mutations in sporadic primary melanomas: an inverse association with allelic loss on chromosome 9
- 18 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oncogene
- Vol. 22 (58) , 9217-9224
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206909
Abstract
We searched and report mutations in the BRAF and N-ras genes in 22 out of 35 (63 percent) primary sporadic melanomas. In three melanomas, mutations were concomitantly present in both genes. In all, 10 out of 12 mutations in the BRAF gene involved the ‘hot spot’ codon 600 (In all communications on mutations in the BRAF gene, the nucleotide and codon numbers have been based on the NCBI gene bank nucleotide sequence NM_004333. However, according to NCBI gene bank sequence with accession number NT_007914, there is a discrepancy of one codon (three nucleotides) in exon 1 in the sequence with accession number NM_004333. The sequence analysis of exon 1 of the BRAF gene in our laboratory has shown that the sequence derived from NT_007914 is correct (Kumar et al., 2003). Due to the correctness of the latter, sequence numbering of codons and nucleotides after exon 1 are changed by +1 and +3, respectively.), one tandem CT1789-90TC base change represented a novel mutation and another mutation caused a G466R amino-acid change within the glycine-rich loop in the kinase domain. Mutations in the N-ras gene in 11 melanomas were at codon 61 whereas two melanomas carried mutations in codon 12 including a tandem mutation GG>AA. We observed an inverse association between BRAF/N-ras mutations and the frequency of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 9 at 10 different loci. Melanomas with BRAF/N-ras mutations showed a statistically significant decreased frequency of LOH on chromosome 9 compared with cases without mutations (mean fractional allelic loss (FAL)=0.29±0.23 vs 0.72±0.33; t-test, P=0.0001). Difference in the FAL value between tumours with and without BRAF/N-ras mutations on 33 loci on five other chromosomes was not statistically significant (mean FAL 0.17±0.19 vs 0.25±0.22; t-test, P=0.24). Melanoma cases with BRAF/N-ras mutations were also associated with lower age at diagnosis than cases without mutations (mean age 80.38±7.24 vs 65.77±19.79 years; t-test, P=0.02). Our data suggest that the occurrence of BRAF/N-ras mutations compensate the requirement for the allelic loss at chromosome 9, which is one of the key events in melanoma.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A pivotal role for ERK in the oncogenic behaviour of malignant melanoma?International Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Pathways to Melanoma Development: Lessons from the MouseJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 2002
- RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair statusNature, 2002
- Geographical Variation in the Penetrance of CDKN2A Mutations for MelanomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancerNature, 2002
- Genetic dissection of melanoma pathways in the mouseSeminars in Cancer Biology, 2001
- Understanding Ras: ‘it ain’t over ’til it’s over’Trends in Cell Biology, 2000
- Genes involved in melanomaMelanoma Research, 1999
- The Pathogenesis of Melanoma Induced by Ultraviolet RadiationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 9p21 (INK4-p14ARF locus)Melanoma Research, 1999