Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: First Results with this New Technology on Neoplasms of the Head and Neck
Open Access
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
- Vol. 78 (4) , 238-251
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014556139907800409
Abstract
Intensity-modulated beam radiotherapy (IMRT) delivers a highly conformal, three-dimensional (3-D) distribution of radiation doses that is not possible with conventional methods. When administered to patients with head and neck tumors, IMRT allows for the treatment of multiple targets with different doses, while simultaneously minimizing radiation to uninvolved critical structures such as the parotid glands, optic chiasm, and mandible. With 3-D computerized dose optimization, IMRT is a vast improvement over the customary trial-and-error method of treatment planning. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of the first 28 head and neck patients at our institution who were treated with IMRT. All had head and neck neoplasms, including squamous cell carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, paraganglioma, and angiofibroma. Total radiation doses ranged from 1,400 to 7,100 cGy, and daily doses ranged from 150 to 400 cGy/day. A quality assurance system ensured that computer-generated dosimetry matched film dosimetry in all cases. For midline tumors, this system allowed us to decrease the dose to the parotid glands to less than 3,000 cGy. The incidence of acute toxicity was drastically lower than that seen with conventional radiotherapy delivery to similar sites. This is the first report of the application of IMRT strictly to head and neck neoplasms. We discuss the indications, technique, and initial results of this promising new technology. We also introduce the concept of the Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Radiation Therapy boost technique, which has several advantages over other altered fractionation schemes.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comment on “Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose” [Med. Phys.24, 103-109 (1997)]Medical Physics, 1997
- In response to Drs. Goitein and Niemierko.International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997
- A comparison of intensity modulated conformal therapy with a conventional external beam stereotactic radiosurgery system for the treatment of single and multiple intracranial lesionsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996
- The field-matching problem as it applies to the peacock three dimensional conformal system for intensity modulationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996
- Clinical realization of 3D conformal intensity modulated radiotherapy: Regarding bortfeld et al., IJROBP 30:899–908; 1994International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Does the “peacock” have anything to do with radiotherapy?International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Concomitant boost radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of carcinoma of the oropharynx and nasopharynxInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1990
- Accelerated Fractionation in the Radiation Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer—A Critical Comparison of Different StrategiesActa Oncologica, 1988
- Improved local control for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma following twice daily radiation therapyAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985