Abstract
There are many anecdotal reports of the recent increase in the incidence of surgery for glue ear, a phenomenon that the medical literature has considered to be a reflection of both an increased prevalence of the underlying condition and its increased detection. However, there has been no attempt to assess these considerations by means of an historical study. This reveals that, contrary to contemporary belief, the condition for which surgery is carried out has been recognized as a commonly occurring problem from at least the early 19th century. This suggests that changes in the surgical rate are more likely to reflect an 'apparent' rather than a 'real' increase in the underlying morbidity rate.

This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit: