Identifying Bull and Bear Markets in Stock Returns
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Vol. 18 (1) , 100-112
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2000.10524851
Abstract
This article uses a Markov-switching model that incorporates duration dependence to capture nonlinear structure in both the conditional mean and the conditional variance of stock returns. The model sorts returns into a high-return stable state and a low-return volatile state. We label these as bull and bear markets, respectively. The filter identifies all major stock-market downturns in over 160 years of monthly data. Bull markets have a declining hazard functions although the best market gains come at the start of a bull market. Volatility increases with duration in bear markets. Allowing volatility to vary with duration captures volatility clustering.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigationPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and changes in regimePublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Modeling the conditional distribution of interest rates as a regime-switching processPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Asymptotic Null Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio Test in Markov Switching ModelsInternational Economic Review, 1998
- Stylized facts of daily return series and the hidden Markov modelJournal of Applied Econometrics, 1998
- Consistent Estimation of Linear and Non‐linear Autoregressive Models with Markov RegimeJournal of Time Series Analysis, 1998
- Stock market volatility and the business cycleJournal of Applied Econometrics, 1996
- Bubbles, Stock Returns, and Duration DependenceJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1994
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Measuring Goodness of Fit in Linear and Nonlinear ModelsSouthern Economic Journal, 1978