Continuous support for women during childbirth
- 21 July 2003
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 3,p. CD003766
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003766
Abstract
Historically, women have been attended and supported by other women during labour. However, in recent decades in hospitals worldwide, continuous support during labour has become the exception rather than the routine. Concerns about the consequent dehumanization of women's birth experiences have led to calls for a return to continuous support by women for women during labour. Primary: to assess the effects, on mothers and their babies, of continuous, one-to-one intrapartum support compared with usual care. Secondary: to determine whether the effects of continuous support are influenced by: (1) routine practices and policies in the birth environment that may affect a woman's autonomy, freedom of movement, and ability to cope with labour; (2) whether the caregiver is a member of the staff of the institution; and (3) whether the continuous support begins early or later in labour. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (30 January 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003). All published and unpublished randomized controlled trials comparing continuous support during labour with usual care. Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration Pregnancy and Childbirth Group were used. All authors participated in evaluation of methodological quality. Data extraction was undertaken independently by one author and a research assistant. Additional information was sought from the trial authors. Results are presented using relative risk for categorical data and weighted mean difference for continuous data. Fifteen trials involving 12,791 women are included. Primary comparison: Women who had continuous intrapartum support were less likely to have intrapartum analgesia, operative birth, or to report dissatisfaction with their childbirth experiences. Subgroup analyses: In general, continuous intrapartum support was associated with greater benefits when the provider was not a member of the hospital staff, when it began early in labour, and in settings in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available. All women should have support throughout labour and birth.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuous support for women during childbirthPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Alternative Strategy to Decrease Cesarean Section: Support by Doulas During LaborThe Journal of Perinatal Education, 2000
- A Randomized Trial of One-to-one Nurse Support of Women in laborBirth, 1997
- Obstetric short communications: Companionship to modify the clinical birth environment: no measurable effect on stress hormone levelsJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995
- A trial on continuous human support during labor: feasibility, interventions and mothers' satisfactionJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1990
- A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Monitrice Support During Labor: Mothers' Views Two to Four Weeks PostpartumBirth, 1989
- Effects of continuous intrapartum professional support on childbirth outcomesResearch in Nursing & Health, 1989
- The Effect of a Supportive Companion on Perinatal Problems, Length of Labor, and Mother-Infant InteractionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980