Theophylline versus terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 6 (2) , 142-147
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pcc.0000154943.24151.58
Abstract
To compare the efficacy of theophylline, terbutaline, or theophylline combined with terbutaline treatment in critically ill children with status asthmaticus who are already receiving continuous nebulized albuterol and intravenous corticosteroids. Randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind trial. Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary-care children's medical center. Forty critically ill children between the ages of 3 and 15 yrs with impending respiratory failure secondary to status asthmaticus. All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone and continuous nebulized albuterol. The three study groups received theophylline plus placebo (group 1), terbutaline plus placebo (group 2), or theophylline and terbutaline together (group 3). Differences in baseline characteristics, change in clinical asthma score over time, length of pediatric intensive care unit stay, and incidence of adverse events were determined. The three study groups were similar in age, gender, race, asthma severity, and treatment. There were no differences in clinical asthma score over time, length of pediatric intensive care unit stay, or incidence of adverse events between the three groups, with the exception of a higher incidence of nausea in children in group 3. The median hospital cost of medication and theophylline blood levels was significantly lower in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (280 US dollars vs. 3,908 US dollars vs. 4,045 US dollars, respectively, p < .0001). Theophylline, when added to continuous nebulized albuterol therapy and intravenous corticosteroids, is as effective as terbutaline in treating critically ill children with status asthmaticus. The addition of theophylline to baseline therapy is more cost-effective when compared with terbutaline alone or terbutaline and theophylline together. Theophylline should be considered for use early in the management of critically ill asthmatic children.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of Aminophylline in the Treatment of Acute Asthma Exacerbation in ChildrenAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1998
- Severe Acute Asthma in a Community Hospital Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: a Ten Years' ExperienceAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 1998
- Intravenous Theophylline in Pediatric Status AsthmaticusClinical Pediatrics, 1995
- Gas exchange response to intravenous aminophylline in patients with a severe exacerbation of asthmaEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1995
- A prospective, randomized study of continuous versus intermittent nebulized albuterol for severe status asthmaticus in childrenCritical Care Medicine, 1993
- Efficacy of intravenously administered theophylline in children hospitalized with severe asthmaThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1993
- Hospital treatment of asthma: lack of benefit from theophylline given in addition to nebulized albuterol and intravenously administered corticosteroidThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1993
- Mechanical ventilation of paediatric patients with asthma: Short and long term outcomeJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1990
- Improvement in clinical asthma score and Paco in children with severe asthma treated with continuously nebulized terbutalineJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1988
- Comparison of IV salbutamol with IV aminophylline in the treatment of severe, acute asthma in childhood.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1979