Role of Imaging in Pretreatment Evaluation of Early Invasive Cervical Cancer: Results of the Intergroup Study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651–Gynecologic Oncology Group 183
Top Cited Papers
- 20 December 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (36) , 9329-9337
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.02.0354
Abstract
Purpose To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with each other and to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical staging in the pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer, using surgicopathologic findings as the reference standard. Patients and Methods This prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network and the Gynecologic Oncology Group from March 2000 to November 2002; 25 United States health centers enrolled 208 consecutive patients with biopsy-confirmed cervical cancer of FIGO stage ≥ IB who were scheduled for surgery based on clinical assessment. Patients underwent FIGO clinical staging, helical CT, and MRI. Surgicopathologic findings constituted the reference standard for statistical analysis. Results Complete data were available for 172 patients; surgicopathologic findings were consistent with FIGO stages IA to IIA in 76% and stage ≥ IIB in 21%. For the detection of advanced stage (≥ IIB), sensitivity was poor for FIGO clinical staging (29%), CT (42%), and MRI (53%); specificity was 99% for FIGO clinical staging, 82% for CT, and 74% for MRI; and negative predictive value was 84% for FIGO clinical staging, 84% for CT, and 85% for MRI. MRI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.88) was significantly better than CT (AUC, 0.73) for detecting cervical tumors (P = .014). For 85% of patients, FIGO clinical staging forms were submitted after MRI and/or CT was performed. Conclusion CT and MRI performed similarly; both had lower staging accuracy than in prior single-institution studies. Accuracy of FIGO clinical staging was higher than previously reported. The temporal data suggest that FIGO clinical staging was influenced by CT and MRI findings.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2005CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2005
- Screening, Diagnosis, and Staging of Cervical CancerPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Cervical Cancer StagingThe Cancer Journal, 2003
- Laparoscopic Staging in Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma: A New Possible Philosophy?Gynecologic Oncology, 1999
- Preoperative Staging of Uterine Cervical CarcinomaJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1993
- Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group studyGynecologic Oncology, 1990
- Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings.Radiology, 1988
- The influence of surgical staging on the evaluation and treatment of patients with cervical carcinomaGynecologic Oncology, 1986
- Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: Experience of the Gynecologic Oncology GroupGynecologic Oncology, 1980
- The staging of cervical cancer: Inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findingsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1971