Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
- Vol. 11 (1) , 105-119
- https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450110109
Abstract
The dynamic nature of alluvial floodplain rivers is a function of flow and sediment regimes interacting with the physiographic features and vegetation cover of the landscape. During seasonal inundation, the flood pulse forms a ‘moving littoral’ that traverses the plain, increasing productivity and enhancing connectivity. The range of spatio‐temporal connectivity between different biotopes, coupled with variable levels of natural disturbance, determine successional patterns and habitat heterogeneity that are responsible for maintaining the ecological integrity of floodplain river systems. Flow regulation by dams, often compounded by other modifications such as levee construction, normally results in reduced connectivity and altered successional trajectories in downstream reaches. Flood peaks are typically reduced by river regulation, which reduces the frequency and extent of floodplain inundation. A reduction in channel‐forming flows reduces channel migration, an important phenomenon in maintaining high levels of habitat diversity across floodplains. The seasonal timing of floods may be shifted by flow regulation, with major ramifications for aquatic and terrestrial biota. Truncation of sediment transport may result in channel degradation for many kilometres downstream from a dam. Deepening of the channel lowers the water‐table, which affects riparian vegetation dynamics and reduces the effective base level of tributaries, which results in rejuvenation and erosion. Ecological integrity in floodplain rivers is based in part on a diversity of water bodies with differing degrees of connectivity with the main river channel. Collectively, these water bodies occupy a wide range of successional stages, thereby forming a mosaic of habitat patches across the floodplain, This diversity is maintained by a balance between the trend toward terrestrialization and flow disturbances that renew connectivity and reset successional sequences. To counter the influence of river regulation, restoration efforts should focus on reestablishing dynamic connectivity between the channel and floodplain water bodies.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial distribution of interstitial assemblages in the floodplain of the rhǒne riverRegulated Rivers: Research & Management, 1992
- How to survive six months in a flooded soil: Strategies in Chilopoda and Symphyla from Central Amazonian floodplains∗Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 1992
- Water mangement and ecological perspectives of the upper rhine's floodplainsRegulated Rivers: Research & Management, 1990
- Primary Production in the Orinoco RiverEcology, 1988
- Dynamique spatio-temporelle des déplacements de macroinvertébrés dans une grande rivièreCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1988
- The reversible process concept applied to the environmental management of large river systemsEnvironmental Management, 1987
- Importance of Snag Habitat for Animal Production in Southeastern StreamsFisheries, 1985
- The effects of altered hydrologic regime on tree growth along the Missouri River in North DakotaCanadian Journal of Botany, 1982
- Les « ensembles fonctionnels » : des entités écologiques qui traduisent l'évolution de l'hydrosystème en intégrant la géomorphologie et l'anthropisation (exemple du Haut-Rhône français)Géocarrefour, 1982
- The fishes and the aquatic environment of the central Amazon basin, with particular reference to respiratory patternsCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1978