Comparative Kinematics and Hydrodynamics of Odontocete Cetaceans: Morphological and Ecological Correlates With Swimming Performance
Open Access
- 15 October 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 201 (20) , 2867-2877
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.201.20.2867
Abstract
Propulsive morphology and swimming performance were compared for the odontocete cetaceans Delphinapterus leucas, Orcinus orca, Pseudorca crassidens and Tursiops truncatus. Morphological differences were apparent among the whales. The general body contour and low-aspect-ratio caudal flukes of D. leucas indicated that this species was a low-performance swimmer compared with the other species. Propulsive motions were video-taped as animals swam steadily in large pools. Video tapes were analyzed digitally using a computerized motion-analysis system. Animals swam at relative velocities ranging from 0.4 to 2.4 body lengths s−1. The stroke amplitude of the flukes decreased linearly with velocity for D. leucas, but amplitude remained constant for the other species. Tail-beat frequencies were directly related to relative swimming velocity, whereas the pitch angle of the flukes was inversely related to relative swimming velocity. Unsteady lifting-wing theory was used with regression equations based on kinematics to calculate thrust power output, drag coefficients and propulsive efficiency. Compared with other species, O. orca generated the largest thrust power (36.3 kW) and had the lowest drag coefficient (0.0026), whereas T. truncatus displayed the largest mass-specific thrust power (23.7 W kg−1) and P. crassidens had the highest efficiency (0.9). D. leucas did not swim as rapidly as the other species and had a comparatively higher minimum drag coefficient (0.01), lower mass-specific thrust power (5.2 W kg−1) and lower maximum efficiency (0.84). Minimum drag coefficients were associated with high swimming speeds, and maximum efficiencies corresponded with velocities in the range of typical cruising speeds. The results indicate that the kinematics of the propulsive flukes and hydrodynamics are associated with the swimming behaviors and morphological designs exhibited by the whales in this study, although additional factors will influence morphology.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- KILLER WHALE (ORCINUS ORCA) PREDATION ON DUSKY DOLPHINS (LAGENORHYNCHUS OBSCURUS) IN KAIKOURA, NEW ZEALANDMarine Mammal Science, 1998
- Transitions from Drag-based to Lift-based Propulsion in Mammalian SwimmingAmerican Zoologist, 1996
- SWIMMING KINEMATICS OF A HARBOR PORPOISE (PHOCOENA PHOCOENA) AND AN ATLANTIC WHITE‐SIDED DOLPHIN (LAGENORHYNCHUS ACUTUS)Marine Mammal Science, 1994
- Influence of Hydrodynamic-Design and Propulsive Mode on Mammalian Swimming EnergeticsAustralian Journal of Zoology, 1994
- Measurements of the bodies and flukes of several cetacean speciesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1990
- Propulsion of a fin whale( Balenoptera physalus): why the fin whale is a fast swimmerProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1989
- Efficiency characteristics of crescent-shaped wings and caudal finsNature, 1987
- Swimming velocities, breathing patterns, and estimated costs of locomotion in migrating gray whales, Eschrichtius robustusCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1983
- Large-amplitude elongated-body theory of fish locomotionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1971
- Sustained Swimming Speeds of DolphinsScience, 1960