Quantum and classical descriptions of a measuring apparatus
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 58 (1) , 116-122
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.58.116
Abstract
A measuring apparatus is described by quantum mechanics while it interacts with the quantum system under observation and then it must be given a classical description so that the result of the measurement appears as objective reality. Alternatively, the apparatus may always be treated by quantum mechanics and be measured by a second apparatus, which has such a dual description. This article examines whether these two different descriptions are mutually consistent. It is shown that if the dynamical variable used in the first apparatus is represented by an operator of the Weyl-Wigner type (for example, if it is a linear coordinate), then the conversion from quantum to classical terminology does not affect the final result. However, if the first apparatus encodes the measurement in a different type of operator (e.g., the phase operator), the two methods of calculation may give different results.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mixing quantum and classical mechanicsPhysical Review A, 1997
- Absence of classical and quantum mixingPhysical Review A, 1996
- Is There a Unique Operator for the Phase Difference of Two Quantum Fields?Physical Review Letters, 1996
- Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to ClassicalPhysics Today, 1991
- Ramanujan’s NotebooksPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Distribution functions in physics: FundamentalsPhysics Reports, 1984
- Can we undo quantum measurements?Physical Review D, 1980
- Phase and Angle Variables in Quantum MechanicsReviews of Modern Physics, 1968
- Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation FieldPhysical Review B, 1963
- On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic EquilibriumPhysical Review B, 1932