Anti-histone antibodies in idiopathic and drug-induced lupus recognize distinct intrahistone regions.
Open Access
- 15 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 138 (2) , 446-451
- https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.138.2.446
Abstract
We have identified regions within core histones that are antigenic for autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and drug-induced lupus. An immunoblotting technique was used to determine the reactivity of lupus antibodies for intact histones and for trypsin-resistant histone fragments that lack the amino- and carboxyl-terminal amino acids that are normally exposed in native nucleosomes. In SLE, the predominant anti-histone response was restricted to epitopes in the trypsin-sensitive regions. Of 20 SLE sera that had strong antibody activity for multiple intact histones, 17 showed minimal activity with any of the corresponding trypsin-resistant fragments. A markedly different pattern of reactivity was present in sera of patients with procainamide (Pr)-induced lupus in which antibodies to H2A, H2B, and the H2A-H2B complex had strong fragment activity. Interestingly, recognition of trypsin-resistant fragments was also noted in a small number of SLE sera that contained antibodies to the H2A-H2B complex. In contrast to both SLE and Pr-induced lupus, antibodies induced by hydralazine (Hy) reacted primarily with H3 and H4. Furthermore, these antibodies bound equally well to the corresponding trypsin-resistant regions that are thought to be relatively unexposed in native nucleosomes. Thus, the specificities of anti-histone antibodies in SLE, Pr-induced lupus, and Hy-induced lupus are markedly different, but in each disease reactivity appears to be restricted to a limited number of histone determinants. The data raise the possibility that autoantigen in the form of native nucleosomes may be recognized in SLE and possibly in Pr-induced lupus. In contrast, the propensity of Hy to induce autoantibodies to determinants usually not recognized in SLE or Pr-induced lupus may suggest a different immunogenic stimulus in this disease.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quinidine-lnduced Lupus ErythematosusAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1984
- Proteolytic Digestion Studies of Chromatin Core‐Histone StructureEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1980
- Antigen recognition by T cells and B cells: Recognition of cross-reactivity between native and denatured forms of globular antigensClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1980
- Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1979
- Identification of interacting amino acids at the histone 2A-2B binding siteBiochemistry, 1979
- Antibodies to Histones in Drug-Induced and Idiopathic Lupus ErythematosusJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1978
- Folding of DNA by histones which lack their NH2-terminal regions.Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1978
- Localization of the sites along nucleosome DNA which interact with NH2-terminal histone regions.Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1977
- A pH‐Dependent Interaction between Histones H2A and H2B Involving Secondary and Tertiary FoldingEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1976
- Chromatin structure as probed by nucleases and proteases: Evidence for the central role of hitones H3 and H4Cell, 1976