An Evaluation of Methods for Estimating the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve
- 1 June 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 5 (2) , 149-156
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x8500500204
Abstract
The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve serves as one means for evaluating the performance of diagnostic and predictive test systems. The most commonly used method for estimating the area under an ROC curve utilizes the maximum-likelihood-estimation technique, and a nonparametric method to calculate the area under an ROC curve was recently described. We compared the performance of these two methods. The results for the area under the ROC curve and the standard error of the estimate as calculated by each of the two methods exhibited high correlation. Generally, the nonparametric method yields lower area estimates than the maximum-likelihood-estimation technique. However, these differences generally were small, particularly with ROC curves derived from five or more cutoff points. Consistent results of hypothesis testing of the significance of differences between two ROC curves will be similar, regardless of which method is used, as long as one uses the same estimation technique on the two curves and as long as the two ROC curves being compared are of similar shape.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.Radiology, 1983
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982
- Basic principles of ROC analysisSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978
- The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graphJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1975
- Signal Detectability and Medical Decision-MakingScience, 1971
- Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method dataJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1969
- On the equivalence of two recognition measures of short-term memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1966