Retracted: Group Status and Attributions to Discrimination: Are Low- or High-Status Group Members More Likely to Blame their Failure on Discrimination?
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 24 (8) , 821-837
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298248004
Abstract
Research has shown that low-status group members tend to minimize discrimination as a reason for negative feedback relative to other causes. Three experiments examined whether this tendency is limited to low-status group members or extends to high-status group members. Participants made attributions for negative feedback on a test after receiving information about the probability that they had been discriminated against by an out-group member. Experiment 1 compared women and men, Experiment 2 compared Blacks and Whites, and Experiment 3 compared members of experimentally created low- and high-status groups. All experiments demonstrated that low-status group members were significantly less likely than high-status group members to blame their poor performance on discrimination and more likely to blame their failure on the type of test, the quality of their answers, and their ability and effort. This was especially apparent when the probability for discrimination was ambiguous.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why minority group members perceive or do not perceive the discrimination that confronts them: The role of self-esteem and perceived control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995
- Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995
- Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- The Illusion of Unique Invulnerability and the Use of Effective ContraceptionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1988
- Sex Differences in Global Self-Esteem. A Research ReviewScandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1986
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Perceptions of Vulnerability to VictimizationJournal of Social Issues, 1983
- Cognitive‐Developmental Factors in Emerging Sex Differences in Achievement‐Related ExpectanciesJournal of Social Issues, 1976
- Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975