Errors and Omissions in Diagnostic Records on Admission of Patients to a Nursing Home*

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The primary and secondary diagnoses for 100 geriatric patients consecutively admitted to a nursing home were reviewed for accuracy and omissions. Primary diagnoses were identified as the direct basis for nursing home admission. Other physical, biochemical or behavioral disorders requiring continued therapeutic care were identified as secondary diagnoses. A comparison was made of the diagnosis offered by the referring physician and the diagnosis as determined by the medical staff of the nursing home immediately after admission. In 64 percent of these 100 patients, the primary admitting diagnosis was inaccurate. In 84 percent, the secondary diagnoses were either lacking or inaccurate. The extraordinarily inadequate medical performance with respect to identifying the primary clinical and therapeutic problems of the chronically ill aged was remarkably consistent, regardless of the source of the patient's referral, whether from a general or psychiatric hospital, a private home, or another nursing home. The results of this study revealed a significant degree of unpreparedness and malaise in some members of the medical profession concerning the care of the chronically ill aged, particularly when such patients demonstrate behavioral disorders superimposed upon physical disease. Failure to identify the patient's needs through diagnosis must result in poor, inadequate or inappropriate treatment programs.

This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit: