Q fever in Great Britain. Epidemiological information from a serological survey of healthy adults in Kent and East Anglia
- 1 March 1956
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Epidemiology and Infection
- Vol. 54 (1) , 118-140
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400044375
Abstract
1. Eleven thousand two hundred and twenty-eight sera from persons, mostly blood donors, living in Kent and seven counties in East Anglia, have been tested and 379 (3·4%) found to have complement-fixing antibody toRickettsia burnetiat a serum titre of 1/10 or greater.2. A group of 396 donors in Kent and East Anglia, composed of 190 donors with antibody, and 206 donors from those without antibody to serve as controls, were interviewed, and an epidemiological history was obtained on the possible ways in which they had been exposed toR. burnetiduring the period 1942–53.3. A comparison of the epidemiological histories of the positive and negative donors showed that donors in Kent who had constant occupational exposure to cattle and sheep including unprocessed materials from them, or who had had a raw milk supply to their homes for all or part of the period 1942–53, more frequently had antibody than those donors without such qualities. In East Anglia the positive serological state among donors was associated only with the use of raw milk and not with occupational exposure to animals. There were suggestive findings among Kentish donors that those who visited farms or other potentially infectious places, either during the course of their job or during their leisure, also experienced greater risk of infection.4. In general, these findings of infection from occupational exposure, from visits to infectious localities, or from the use of raw milk in the home, confirmed the tentative epidemiological conclusions drawn from a previous investigation of patients with Q fever. It was not found in this survey, however, that residence near dairy farms, receipt of objects from potentially infectious localities, or contact with persons from such localities was associated with a special risk of infection.5. No association was found between the donors' serological state and the keeping of dogs, cats, poultry, pigs, rabbits, psittacine birds in the vicinity of the home or its infestation by mice, rats or mosquitoes.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Q Fever in Britain: Isolation of Rickettsia Burneti from Placenta and Wool of Sheep in an Endemic AreaEpidemiology and Infection, 1955
- Problems in the diagnosis of Q fever by complement-fixation tests.1955
- MURINE TYPHUS IN WESTERN AUSTRALIAThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1954
- Q FEVER IN GREAT BRITAIN SHEEP AS A SOURCE OF INFECTION FOR MANThe Lancet, 1954
- Q FEVER IN GREAT BRITAIN: AN ANALYSIS OF 69 SPORADIC CASES, WITH A STUDY OF THE PREVALENCE OF INFECTION IN HUMANS AND COWSThe Lancet, 1953
- Experimental and Natural Infection of Birds by Coxiella burnetiNature, 1952
- Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance.1951
- Q FEVER IN GREAT BRITAIN EPIDEMIOLOGY OF AN OUTBREAKThe Lancet, 1950
- EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES OF Q FEVER IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAJAMA, 1950
- Q Fever. A Note Clarifying the Identity of American Strains of Coxiella burnettiiAmerican Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1949