A Comparison of Three Hearing Aid Evaluation Procedures for Young Children
- 1 July 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Otolaryngology (1960)
- Vol. 103 (7) , 401-406
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1977.00780240059008
Abstract
• The evaluation of hearing aid performance with young, nonverbal children traditionally consists of a comparison between aided and unaided thresholds. Alternative evaluation procedures include those that provide an estimate of the speech spectrum area that is potentially audible to the child with amplification. This study compared the hearing aid performance results for ten hearing impaired children evaluated with a soundfield procedure and two speech spectrum methods. Results obtained for three hearing aids demonstrated no differences in hearing aid recommendation between procedures for children with only mildmoderate hearing loss. For children with severe to profound losses, however, the sound-field audiogram was found to overestimate what is potentially audible to the child. (Arch Otolaryngol 103:401-406, 1977)This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Visual Perception of Speech by Deaf Children: Recent Developments and Continuing NeedsJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1974
- Evaluation of Hearing Aid Fittings for InfantsBritish Journal of Audiology, 1974
- Body-Baffle and Real-Ear Effects in the Selection of Hearing Aids for Deaf ChildrenJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1973
- A Frequency-Response Procedure for Evaluating and Selecting Hearing Aids for Severely Hearing-Impaired ChildrenJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1971
- The International Standard Reference Zero for Pure-Tone Audiometers And Its Relation to the Evaluation of Impairment of HearingJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1964