Are all secondary sexual display structures positively allometric and, if so, why?
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Animal Behaviour
- Vol. 43 (1) , 173-175
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80087-9
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Positive allometry is likely with mate choice, competitive display and other functionsAnimal Behaviour, 1992
- Viability costs of male tail ornaments in a swallowNature, 1989
- Intraspecific variation in structures that display competitive ability: large animals invest relatively moreAnimal Behaviour, 1988
- Patterns of variation in tail ornament size in birdsBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1988
- Behavioral Correlates of Male Morphology in a Horned BeetleThe American Naturalist, 1986
- Truth in Advertising: The Kinds of Traits Favored by Sexual SelectionThe American Naturalist, 1984
- Positive Allometry of Antlers in the “Irish Elk”, Megaloceros giganteusNature, 1973
- 46. The Relative Size of Antlers in DeerJournal of Zoology, 1931