Deciding not to resuscitate in Dutch hospitals.
Open Access
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 19 (4) , 200-205
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.19.4.200
Abstract
The use of do not resuscitate (DNR) orders in Dutch hospitals was studied as part of a nationwide study on medical decisions concerning the end of life. DNR decisions are made in 6 per cent of all admissions, and 61 per cent of all in-hospital deaths were preceded by a DNR decision. We found that in only 14 per cent of the cases had the patients been involved in the DNR decision (32 per cent of competent patients). The concept of futility is analysed as these findings are discussed. We conclude that determining the effectiveness of resuscitation is a medical judgement whereas determining the proportionality (burden/benefit ratio) of it requires a discussion between doctor and patient (or his or her surrogates). Since the respondents in the cases without patient involvement gave many reasons for their decision that went beyond determining effectiveness, we conclude that more patient involvement would have been desirable.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resuscitation policies--action required.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1992
- Survey of "do not resuscitate" orders in a district general hospital.BMJ, 1991
- Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of lifeThe Lancet, 1991
- Do‐not‐resuscitate orders in Swedish medical wardsJournal of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Medical Futility: Its Meaning and Ethical ImplicationsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- The Do-Not-Resuscitate OrderArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1990
- Resuscitation decisions in a general hospital.BMJ, 1990
- The 'Do Not Resuscitate' OrderArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1988
- Do-Not-Resuscitate Decisions in a Community HospitalJAMA, 1986
- 'Do Not Resuscitate' DecisionsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1985