Effectiveness of Bystander-Initiated Cardiac-Only Resuscitation for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Top Cited Papers
- 18 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 116 (25) , 2900-2907
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.723411
Abstract
Background— Previous animal and clinical studies suggest that bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation may be superior to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Our hypothesis was that both cardiac-only bystander resuscitation and conventional bystander CPR would improve outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of ≤15 minutes’ duration, whereas the addition of rescue breathing would improve outcomes for cardiac arrests lasting >15 minutes. Methods and Results— We carried out a prospective, population-based, observational study involving consecutive patients with emergency responder resuscitation attempts from May 1, 1998, through April 30, 2003. The primary outcome measure was 1-year survival with favorable neurological outcome. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between type of CPR and outcomes. Among the 4902 witnessed cardiac arrests, 783 received conventional CPR, and 544 received cardiac-only resuscitation. Excluding very-long-duration cardiac arrests (>15 minutes), the cardiac-only resuscitation yielded a higher rate of 1-year survival with favorable neurological outcome than no bystander CPR (4.3% versus 2.5%; odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.95), and conventional CPR showed similar effectiveness (4.1%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.60). For the very-long-duration arrests, neurologically favorable 1-year survival was greater in the conventional CPR group, but there were few survivors regardless of the type of bystander CPR (0.3% [2 of 624], 0% [0 of 92], and 2.2% [3 of 139] in the no bystander CPR, cardiac-only CPR, and conventional CPR groups, respectively; P Conclusions— Bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation and conventional CPR are similarly effective for most adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. For very prolonged cardiac arrests, the addition of rescue breathing may be of some help.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Evaluation in Los Angeles: CARE-LAAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Uninterrupted chest compression CPR is easier to perform and remember than standard CPRResuscitation, 2004
- Single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: ‘two quick breaths’—an oxymoronResuscitation, 2004
- Experiences from treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during 17 years in GöteborgEuropean Heart Journal, 2000
- Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support: 1. Skill acquisition at bronze stageResuscitation, 2000
- The Need for Ventilatory Support During Bystander CPRAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Bystander CPR, Ventricular Fibrillation, and Survival in Witnessed, Unmonitored Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Effect of bystander initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation on ventricular fibrillation and survival after witnessed cardiac arrest outside hospital.Heart, 1994
- Outcome of CPR in a large metropolitan area — where are the survivors?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1991
- Attitudes of BCLS instructors about mouth-to-mouth resuscitation during the AIDS epidemicAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990