A Model for Estimating the Reliability of Psychomotor Test Batteries
- 1 March 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
- Vol. 55 (1) , 53-63
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1984.10605355
Abstract
Some types of motor behavior cannot be measured by one test alone. For example, physical fitness is typically viewed as a multifaceted construct which should be measured by a battery comprising a group of tests. Test developers typically report a reliability estimate for each individual test in the battery. If the reliability of each test is acceptable, the reliability of the test battery is assumed to be satisfactory. However, measurement error can affect the total battery as well as each individual test. A proposed model for estimating test battery reliability based upon canonical correlation analysis is described in this paper. Descriptive statistics from previous investigations and nonempirical data are used to exemplify the procedure. Finally, modifications of the model for psychomotor test batteries are delineated.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Canonical/Redundancy Factoring AnalysisPsychometrika, 1981
- Relationships between Redundancy Analysis, Canonical Correlation, and Multivariate RegressionPsychometrika, 1981
- Redundancy in Canonical AnalysisResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1981
- On redundancy in canonical analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- The Sampling Distribution and a Test for the Significance of the Bimultivariate Redundancy Statistic: A Monte Carlo StudyMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1975
- On the mathematical bases of the general canonical correlation index: Rejoinder to Miller.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- In defense of the general canonical correlation index: Reply to Nicewander and Wood.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Comments on "A general canonical correlation index."Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- Interactions among interests, abilities, and career plans.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967
- The most predictable criterion.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1935