Evidence‐based care and outcomes of acute stroke managed in hospital specialty units
- 7 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 178 (7) , 318-323
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05221.x
Abstract
To assess the use of evidence-based investigations and treatments in patients with acute stroke in selected Australian hospitals and to compare management and outcomes between stroke and other types of hospital specialty unit. Retrospective, multicentre audit of hospital case files. Eight metropolitan tertiary-care hospitals from five Australian States. 300 consecutive patients from each hospital admitted between 17 September 1999 and 23 May 2001 and having a discharge diagnosis of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Use of investigations and treatments supported by best available evidence; comparison of management and outcomes between stroke, neurology, general medical and geriatric units. 2383 patients were audited (median age, 72.7 years; 52% men); 72% had ischaemic events, and 28% haemorrhagic events. Use of investigations and treatments varied between hospitals and types of unit. Stroke units or teams cared directly for 23% of patients (range across hospitals, 0-100%). Although 47% of patients with ischaemic events presented within 3 hours of symptom onset (when thrombolysis might provide benefit), only nine (2%) received thrombolysis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were given to 28% of survivors at discharge (range, 14%-38%). Stroke units were more likely to use diagnostic tests, while neurology units were more likely to prescribe heparin acutely for patients with ischaemic stroke (not recommended for patients in general), and geriatric units were less likely to discharge patients with atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation therapy. Outcomes also varied significantly between types of unit. In-hospital survival rates were 90% (stroke units), 91% (neurological units), 82% (general medical units) and 79% (geriatric units) (P < 0.001). Stroke units and neurological units sent more patients home than the other units. Stroke units also sent fewer patients to rehabilitation and had longer mean length of stay. Acute stroke care varies between Australian tertiary-care hospitals and types of specialty unit, with suboptimal use of many evidence-based interventions.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Benefit of an Extended Stroke Unit Service With Early Supported DischargeStroke, 2000
- Effects of an Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitor, Ramipril, on Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic strokePublished by Wiley ,1999
- Getting research findings into practice: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findingsBMJ, 1998
- Stroke Unit TreatmentStroke, 1997
- A Systems Approach to Immediate Evaluation and Management of Hyperacute StrokeStroke, 1997
- The Effect of Pravastatin on Coronary Events after Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Average Cholesterol LevelsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.Circulation, 1994
- Do stroke units save lives?The Lancet, 1993
- Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.Stroke, 1993