RISK-SPREADING AND BET-HEDGING IN INSECT POPULATION BIOLOGY
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Entomology
- Vol. 44 (1) , 535-560
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.535
Abstract
In evolutionary ecology, risk-spreading (i.e. bet-hedging) is the idea that unpredictably variable environments favor genotypes with lower variance in fitness at the cost of lower arithmetic mean fitness. Variance in fitness can be reduced by physiology or behavior that spreads risk of encountering an unfavorable environment over time or space. Such risk-spreading can be achieved by a single phenotype that avoids risks (conservative risk-spreading) or by phenotypic variation expressed by a single genotype (diversified risk-spreading). Across these categories, three types of risk-spreading can be usefully distinguished: temporal, metapopulation, and within-generation. Theory suggests that temporal and metapopulation risk-spreading may work under a broad range of population sizes, but within-generation risk-spreading appears to work only when populations are small. Although genetic polymorphisms have sometimes been treated as risk-spreading, the underlying mechanisms are different, and they often require different conditions for their evolution and thus are better treated separately. I review the types of evidence that could be used to test for risk-spreading and discuss evidence for risk-spreading in facultative diapause, migration polyphenism, spatial distribution of oviposition, egg size, and other miscellaneous traits. Although risk-spreading theory is voluminous and well developed in some ways, rarely has it been used to generate detailed, testable hypotheses about the evolution of risk-spreading. Furthermore, although there is evidence for risk-spreading, particularly in facultative diapause, I have been unable to find any definitive tests with unequivocal results showing that risk-spreading has been a major factor in the evolution of insect behaviors or life histories. To advance our understanding of risk-spreading in the wild, we need (a) explicit empirical models that predict levels of diversifying risk-spreading for several insect populations in several environments that vary in uncertainty, and (b) tests of these models using measurements of phenotypes and their fitnesses over several generations in each environment.Keywords
This publication has 101 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environmentPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Effects of emergence date and maternal size on egg development and sizes of eggs and first-instar nymphs of a semelparous aquatic insectOecologia, 1997
- The adaptive role of facultative embryonic diapause in the grasshopper Caledia captiva (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in southeastern AustraliaEcography, 1994
- Maternal Effects Generate Variation in Life History: Consequences of Egg Weight Plasticity in the Gypsy MothFunctional Ecology, 1991
- Diapause induction in changing photoperiodsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1989
- Adaptive “coin-flipping”: a decision-theoretic examination of natural selection for random individual variationJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- Variation in Photoperiodic Response Within and Among Species of Milkweed Bugs (Oncopeltus)Evolution, 1980
- Laboratory studies on aggregation, size and fecundity in the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scop.Bulletin of Entomological Research, 1971
- Population survival in a variable environmentJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1971
- Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment when a correlation may exist between the conditions at the time a choice has to be made and the subsequent outcomeJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1967