To Risk or Not to Risk? Uses and Limitations of Mary Douglas on Risk-Acceptability for Understanding Health and Safety at Work and Road Accidents
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Review
- Vol. 38 (3) , 465-483
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1990.tb00920.x
Abstract
The recent Greening of politics in the West has encouraged rapid development of research into both environmental hazards and risk perceptions among the public. There are also longstanding traditions of research into behaviour under risk in such disparate fields as superpower relations (Allison 1971), inter-country commercial transactions, the economics of uncertainty, and the study of natural disasters (Torry 1979). Relatively few sociologists or social anthropologists have contributed. A major exception is Mary Douglas (1982, 1985, 1987). This paper is an attempt to make use of her work and to tests its limits, in answering two empirical questions: How do managers and workers address workplace hazards? And, how do motorcyclists and drivers behave on the roads?Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is genuine sickness? The relation between work‐discipline and the sick role in a pottery factorySociology of Health & Illness, 1990
- The Perpetuation of a Folk Model of the Life Cycle and Kinship in a Pottery FactoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1987
- STRESS AND COPING DISCOURSEInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 1986
- Anthropological Studies in Hazardous Environments: Past Trends and New Horizons [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1979
- Expressive Self-Testing in DrivingHuman Organization, 1966