Abstract
Burst‐pressure data from 25‐m water depth are used to test a model of wave‐height distribution that incorporates wave breaking. The measurements are of waves from a severe storm and from the periods of calmer weather bracketing the storm. Burst HRMS ranged from 0.09 m to 5.42 m, the highest significant wave height (H1/3) was 7.41 m, and the highest burst‐maximum wave height (Hmax) was 11.82 m. The Rayleigh model overestimated the number of observed high waves, and consequently the predicted H1/3 and Hmax were in error. Tayfun's model of the breaking‐limited wave‐height distribution, which is applicable to a narrow‐band free surface, more accurately reproduced the observed exceedance probabilities, although imperfect crest‐trough correlation, which is guaranteed in an irregular wave train, could also account for the paucity of high waves. Nevertheless, the data support the Stokes‐type breaking criterion that underpins Tayfun's model, and the breaking‐limited model produced significantly better predictions of H1/3 and Hmax at the height of the storm.

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit: