Evaluating the quality of informed consent
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Trials
- Vol. 2 (1) , 34-41
- https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774505cn066oa
Abstract
Context Although informed consent is a critical means of protecting the rights and interests of participants in clinical research, effective and efficient means of evaluating the quality of consent are needed. Having such means will be important to monitoring consent and testing potential improvements in the consent process. Objective To develop and test a practical and general means of evaluating the quality of informed consent for clinical research.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interventions to Improve Research Participants' Understanding in Informed Consent for ResearchJAMA, 2004
- Communication of Randomization in Childhood Leukemia TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Conducting Empirical Research on Informed Consent: Challenges and QuestionsIRB: Ethics & Human Research, 2003
- Improving Informed Consent: The Medium Is Not the MessageIRB: Ethics & Human Research, 2003
- Improving Protection for Research SubjectsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Protecting Research Subjects — What Must Be DoneNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical TrialsJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2000
- Improving Informed Consent in Clinical Trials: A Duty to ExperimentControlled Clinical Trials, 1999
- Special Supplement: Empirical Research on Informed Consent: An Annotated BibliographyHastings Center Report, 1999
- Getting Meaningful Informed Consent from Older Adults: A Structured Literature Review of Empirical ResearchJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1998