Reducing earthquake risk: alternative policy processes
Open Access
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- blindspots
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Project Appraisal
- Vol. 2 (4) , 210-220
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1987.9726634
Abstract
Developing effective environmental policies involves diverse parties-at-interest in complex, long-term relationships. This paper addresses policies to mitigate risks to structures from earthquakes in the Southeastern United States. This problem is characterized by a lack of perceived risk, despite expert consensus that a substantial physical risk exists. We first present a general model of the environmental policy actions that might be taken. This model is then used to weigh a dozen alternative policy strategies that have been advocated in certain contexts. We conclude that a limited set of strategies offer promise for this “10% risk; 10% solution” situation.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Societal Response to Hazards and Major Hazard Events: Comparing Natural and Technological HazardsPublic Administration Review, 1985
- The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of ChoiceScience, 1981
- Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived RiskPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- Preference for Insuring against Probable Small Losses: Insurance ImplicationsJournal of Risk and Insurance, 1977