Treatment of Lower Ureteral Stones Using the Dornier Compact Delta Lithotripter
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 17 (6) , 369-371
- https://doi.org/10.1089/089277903767923137
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Lithotripsy using new-generation machines requires minimal anesthesia and so can easily be given in an outpatient setting. We report our experience with the Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter in the primary management of lower ureteral stones. Patients and Methods: We identified 128 patients treated with SWL for lower-ureteral stones between April 1999 and August 2001. Complete follow-up was available for 112 patients. Their ages ranged from 19 to 78 years, with women accounting for 23%. Only three patients had a ureteral stent in situ. All patients were routinely followed up at 2 weeks with a plain film. The timing of further follow-up depended on the initial response to treatment. Results: Fragmentation occurred in 83 of 112 stones (74%): 93% of the successful cases and 43% of the unsuccessful ones. A total of 59 patients (53%) were stone free after one treatment. This figure increased to 73 (65%) after a second treatment. The mean size of the successfully treated stones was less than that of the failed stones (7.6 v 8.7 mm), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Stone-free rates decreased as stone size increased, being 71% for the 28 stones ≤5 mm in diameter, 65% for the 52 stones 6 to 9 mm, 64% for the 25 stones 10 to 14 mm, and 42% for the 7 stones ≥15 mm. Conclusions: When SWL can be delivered promptly in an outpatient setting, it remains a useful first-line treatment for lower ureteral stones. Although it is not as effective as ureteroscopy, its use can avert the need for more invasive treatment in half to two thirds of patients. It should be limited to stones <15 mm.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND URETEROSCOPY FOR MANAGEMENT OF DISTAL URETERAL CALCULIJournal of Urology, 2001
- Optimal Treatment for Distal Ureteral Calculi: Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy versus UreteroscopyJournal of Endourology, 2001
- LOW SUCCESS RATE OF REPEAT SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR URETERAL STONES AFTER FAILED INITIAL TREATMENTJournal of Urology, 2000
- Primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi: results with a third‐generation lithotripterBJU International, 1999
- A COMPARISON OF URETEROSCOPY TO IN SITU EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISTAL URETERAL CALCULIJournal of Urology, 1999
- Holmium:YAG lasertripsy for ureteric calculi: an experience of 300 proceduresBritish Journal of Urology, 1998
- Treatment of Ureteral Stones: Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Endourologic AlternativesEuropean Urology, 1998
- Treatment of mid‐ and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock‐wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectivenessBritish Journal of Urology, 1998
- Optimal Therapy for the Distal Ureteral Stone: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus UreteroscopyJournal of Urology, 1994
- EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK‐WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR DISTAL URETERIC CALCULIAnz Journal of Surgery, 1992