Discrimination Between Stages of Alzheimer's Disease With Subsets of Mini-Mental State Examination Items
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Neurology
- Vol. 51 (9) , 916-921
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1994.00540210088017
Abstract
Objective: To identify minimal sets of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) items that can distinguish normal control subjects from patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD), patients with mild from those with moderate AD, and those with moderate from those with severe AD. Design: Two randomly selected equivalent half samples. Results of logistic regression analysis from data from the first half of the sample were confirmed by receiver operating characteristic curves on the second half. Setting: Memory disorders clinics at major medical centers in the United States affiliated with the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Participants: White, normal control subjects (n=412) and patients with AD (n=621) who met CERAD criteria; nonwhite subjects (n=165) and persons with missing data (n=27) were excluded. Main Outcome Measures: Three four-item sets of MMSE items that discriminate, respectively, (1) normal controls from patients with mild AD, (2) patients with mild from those with moderate AD, and (3) patients with moderate from those with severe AD. Results: The MMSE items discriminating normal controls from patients with mild AD were day, date, recall of apple, and recall of penny; those discriminating patients with mild from those with moderate AD were month, city, spelling world backward, and county; and those discriminating patients with moderate from those with severe AD were floor of building, repeating the word table, naming watch, and folding paper in half. Performance on the first two four-item sets was comparable with that of the full MMSE; the third set distinguished patients with moderate from those with severe AD better than chance. Conclusions: A minimum set of MMSE items can effectively discriminate normal controls from patients with mild AD and between successive levels of severity of AD. Data apply only to white patients with AD. Performance in minorities, more heterogeneous groups, or normal subjects with questionable cognitive status has not been assessed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Mini‐Mental State Examination: Identifying the Most Efficient Variables for Detecting Cognitive Impairment in the ElderlyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1992
- Effect of Education on the Mini‐Mental State Examination as a Screening Test for DementiaJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991
- The Association of Education and Socioeconomic Status with the Mini Mental State Examination and the Clinical Diagnosis of Dementia in Elderly PeopleAge and Ageing, 1990
- Alzheimer Patient Evaluation and the Mini-Mental State: Item Characteristic Curve AnalysisJournal of Gerontology, 1989
- The influence of education, social class and sex on Mini-Mental State scoresPsychological Medicine, 1989
- Relationship of health and demographic characteristics to Mini-Mental State Examination score among community residentsPsychological Medicine, 1988
- A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.Radiology, 1983
- A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of DementiaThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1982
- Limits of the ‘Mini-Mental State’ as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patientsPsychological Medicine, 1982
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982