ON THE COMPARISON OF TWO CLASSIFICATIONS OF THE SAME SET OF ELEMENTS
- 1 August 1971
- Vol. 20 (4) , 519-522
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1218253
Abstract
Summary: A standard method of comparing classifications is the “cophenetic correlation” technique of Sokal and Rohlf (1962). The method is re‐examined, and is shown to possess two shortcomings which make it unsuitable for the truncated, intensely‐clustering strategies now in common use. These shortcomings are (i) it is unable to distinguish between changes due to group composition and changes due to configuration of groups within the hierarchy, and (ii) it is sensitive to the convention used for representing the hierarchy in two dimensions. A revised form of the strategy is proposed which appears to overcome these difficulties.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Construction of Hierarchic and Non-Hierarchic ClassificationsThe Computer Journal, 1968
- A General Theory of Classificatory Sorting Strategies: 1. Hierarchical SystemsThe Computer Journal, 1967
- Multivariate Methods in Plant Ecology: V. Similarity Analyses and Information-AnalysisJournal of Ecology, 1966
- THE COMPARISON OF DENDROGRAMS BY OBJECTIVE METHODSTaxon, 1962
- Measures of Association for Cross ClassificationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1954