Exposure-response relationships for everolimus in de novo kidney transplantation: defining a therapeutic range
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 73 (6) , 920-925
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200203270-00016
Abstract
Exposure, safety, and efficacy data from the two everolimus randomized, double-blind phase 3 trials were evaluated to identify a therapeutic concentration range applicable in de novo kidney transplantation. A total of 695 evaluable everolimus-treated patients received either 0.75 or 1.5 mg bid in addition to corticosteroids and cyclosporine (troughs 150–400 ng/ml in month 1 and 100–300 ng/ml thereafter). A total of 3355 everolimus trough levels (Cmin) were obtained in weeks 1 and 2 and months 1, 2, 3, and 6 after transplantation. Each patient’s average Cmin was calculated and the values were divided into quintiles: 1.0–3.4, 3.5–4.5, 4.6–5.7, 5.8–7.7, 7.8–15.0 ng/ml (139 patients per quintile). Efficacy was freedom from biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Safety measures were maximum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels and minimum leukocyte and platelet counts. A sigmoid exposure-response model was used to test the significance of these Cmin-efficacy and Cmin-safety relationships. Freedom from acute rejection was significantly related to Cmin with an incidence of 68% at 1.0–3.4 ng/ml, 81–86% at 3.5–7.7 ng/ml, and 91% at 7.8–15.0 ng/ml (P =0.03). The incidence of hypercholesterolemia, defined as >6.5 mmol/liter, ranged from 76 to 87% over the exposure range without a significant relation to Cmin (P =0.37). The incidence of hypertriglyceridemia, defined as >2.9 mmol/liter, rose from 59 to 77% across the exposure groups (P =0.02). Leukocytopenia, defined as <4×109/liter, occurred in 11–19% of patients across the exposure quintiles showing no relationship to Cmin (P =0.76). The incidence of thrombocytopenia, defined as <100×109/liter, occurred in ≤10% of patients in the first 3 Cmin quintiles and was 14 and 17% in Cmin quintiles 4 and 5 (P =0.21). A significantly increased risk of acute rejection was observed at everolimus trough levels <3 ng/ml. This is a lower therapeutic concentration limit when everolimus is used with conventionally dosed cyclosporine. Because hyperlipidemias responded to counter-measure therapies and thrombocytopenia had an overall low incidence of 12%, everolimus-related adverse events were manageable up to the highest troughs observed in this population of 15 ng/ml. An upper therapeutic concentration limit is likely more than15 ng/ml but a precise value could not be derived from these data.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- RAD IN DE NOVO RENAL TRANSPLANTATION: COMPARISON OF THREE DOSES ON THE INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF ACUTE REJECTION 1Transplantation, 2001
- Longitudinal assessment of everolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients over the first post-transplant year: Pharmacokinetics, exposure-response relationships, and influence on cyclosporineClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2001
- Efficacy of sirolimus compared with azathioprine for reduction of acute renal allograft rejection: a randomised multicentre studyThe Lancet, 2000
- Therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus: correlations with efficacy and toxicityClinical Transplantation, 2000
- A PHASE I STUDY OF A 4-WEEK COURSE OF SDZ-RAD (RAD) IN QUIESCENT CYCLOSPORINE-PREDNISONE-TREATED RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1,2Transplantation, 1999
- Correlation Between Pretransplantation Test Dose Cyclosporine Pharmacokinetic Profiles and Posttransplantation Sirolimus Blood Levels in Renal Transplant RecipientsTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1999
- SDZ RAD, A NEW RAPAMYCIN DERIVATIVETransplantation, 1997
- The side effect profile of sirolimus: A phase I study in quiescent cyclosporine-prednisone-treated renal transplant patientsKidney International, 1996
- Rapamune (Sirolimus, Rapamycin): An Overview and Mechanism of ActionTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 1995
- Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitorsAdvances in Enzyme Regulation, 1984