Primary activation of interferon A and interferon B gene transcription by interferon regulatory factor 3
- 18 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 95 (17) , 9837-9842
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.17.9837
Abstract
The family of interferon (IFN) regulatory factors (IRFs) encodes DNA-binding transcription factors, some of which function as modulators of virus-induced signaling. The IRF-3 gene is constitutively expressed in many tissues and cell types, and neither virus infection nor IFN treatment enhances its transcription. In infected cells, however, IRF-3 protein is phosphorylated at the carboxyl terminus, which facilitates its binding to the CBP/p300 coactivator. In the present study, we demonstrate that overexpression of IRF-3 significantly enhances virus-mediated transcription of the IFNA and IFNB genes in infected cells as well as IFN synthesis. IRF-3-mediated activation of IFN genes depends in part on carboxyl-terminal phosphorylation of a cluster of Ser/Thr residues, because a mutant with Ser/Thr to Ala substitutions activates the IFN promoter less efficiently. However, overexpression of IRF-3 in human 2FTGH cells alone results in the induction of an antiviral state, which depends on functional IFN signaling, because IRF-3 does not induce an antiviral state in mutant 2FTGH cells defective in either JAK-1 or p48 functions; also no antiviral effect of IRF-3 could be demonstrated in Vero cells that lack the IFNA and IFNB genes. This finding indicates that the observed antiviral activity of IRF-3 in 2FTGH cells results mainly from the induction of IFNs. Furthermore, E1A protein inhibited IRF-3-mediated stimulation of the IFNA4 promoter in transient expression assays; this inhibition could be reversed partially by overexpression of CBP/p300 and was not demonstrated with the mutant of E1A that does not bind p300. These results identify IRF-3 and CBP/p300 as integral components of the virus-induced complex that stimulates type 1 IFN gene transcription. The observation that adenovirus E1A antagonizes IRF-3 mediated activation suggests that E1A and IRF-3 may compete for binding to CBP/p300 and implicates a novel mechanism by which adenovirus may overcome the antiviral effects of the IFN pathway.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Use of CREB Binding Protein-Coactivator ComplexesScience, 1998
- Recruitment of CBP/p300 by the IFNβ Enhanceosome Is Required for Synergistic Activation of TranscriptionMolecular Cell, 1998
- The Mechanism of Transcriptional Synergy of an In Vitro Assembled Interferon-β EnhanceosomeMolecular Cell, 1997
- Regulation of NF-κB by Cyclin-Dependent Kinases Associated with the p300 CoactivatorScience, 1997
- Regulation of IFN‐α/β genes: evidence for a dual function of the transcription factor complex ISGF3 in the production and action of IFN‐α/βGenes to Cells, 1996
- Pip, a lymphoid-restricted IRF, contains a regulatory domain that is important for autoinhibition and ternary complex formation with the Ets factor PU.1.Genes & Development, 1996
- Cooperation of Stat2 and p300/CBP in signalling induced by interferon-αNature, 1996
- The Signal-Dependent Coactivator CBP Is a Nuclear Target for pp90RSKCell, 1996
- Activation of a cell-cycle-regulated histone gene by the oncogenic transcription factor IRF-2Nature, 1995
- Structurally similar but functionally distinct factors, IRF-1 and IRF-2, bind to the same regulatory elements of IFN and IFN-inducible genesPublished by Elsevier ,1989