Strike‐free Deals and Pendulum Arbitration
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Industrial Relations
- Vol. 28 (1) , 32-56
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1990.tb00351.x
Abstract
This article analyses the legal and procedural aspects of strike‐free deals, focusing in particular on their contractual status, the drafting of their no‐strike clauses, and the ‘binding’ nature of their provisions on pendulum arbitration. Drawing on the author's experience as an arbitrator, it is argued that there is considerable diversity within the strike‐free format but that in general the similarities between strike‐free and conventional procedures are greater than their differences.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- MANAGERIAL STRATEGY AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: A CASE STUDY OF PLANT RELOCATIONJournal of Management Studies, 1986
- How New is Final‐ Offer Arbitration?Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1986
- Last Offer ArbitrationBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1985
- Early retirement: recent trends and implicationsIndustrial Relations Journal, 1984
- Collective Agreements: The Kahn-Freund LegacyThe Modern Law Review, 1979
- Final Offer Arbitration: Better Theory Than PracticeIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1975
- Final Offer Arbitration and the Chilling EffectIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1975
- Either-or Arbitration for Public Employee DisputesIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1972
- THE LEGAL ENFORCEABILITY OF COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTSBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1970
- Is Compulsory Arbitration Compatible With Bargaining?Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1966