The concept of the marginally matched subject in propensity-score matched analyses
- 24 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Vol. 18 (6) , 469-482
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1733
Abstract
Propensity-score matching is increasingly being used to reduce the impact of treatment-selection bias when estimating causal treatment effects using observational data. Matching on the propensity score creates sets of treated and untreated subjects who have a similar distribution of baseline covariates. Propensity-score matching frequently relies upon calipers, such that matched treated and untreated subjects must have propensity scores that lie within a specified caliper distance of each other. We define the ‘marginally matched’ subject as a subject who would be matched using the specified caliper width, but who would not have been matched had calipers with a narrower width been employed. Using patients hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction (or heart attack) and with exposure to a statin prescription at discharge, we demonstrate that the inclusion of marginally matched subjects can have both a quantitative and qualitative impact upon the estimated treatment effect. Furthermore, marginally matched treated subjects can differ from marginally matched untreated subjects to a substantially greater degree than the differences between non-marginally matched treated and untreated subjects in the propensity-score matched sample. The concept of the marginally matched subject can be used as a sensitivity analysis to examine the impact of the matching method on the estimates of treatment effectiveness. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003Statistics in Medicine, 2007
- Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review and suggestions for improvementThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2007
- A comparison of regression trees, logistic regression, generalized additive models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines for predicting AMI mortalityStatistics in Medicine, 2006
- A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo studyStatistics in Medicine, 2006
- A comparison of propensity score methods: a case‐study estimating the effectiveness of post‐AMI statin useStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Comparing Clinical Data with Administrative Data for Producing Acute Myocardial Infarction Report CardsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2005
- The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical dataStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Observational StudiesPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity ScoreJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983