Vocational Reconstruction and Dewey's Instrumentalism
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Oxford Review of Education
- Vol. 19 (1) , 89-100
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498930190107
Abstract
The recent Government White Paper on further education (now part of the Further and Higher Education Act) made a host of proposals designed to address some urgent issues in the post‐compulsory sector, including the need to increase the post‐16 participation rate and to upgrade generally vocational education and training to bring the British system on a level with those in France and Germany. A central problem in this area is the cultural divide between the vocational and the academic, and the White Paper proposes to bridge this gulf by introducing new diplomas and by expanding the framework of National Vocational Qualifications. The origins of the cultural chasm between the vocational and the academic are briefly explored, and criticisms of the Government proposals are put forward, particularly the use of National Vocational Qualifications as a means of enhancing vocational education and training. What is required is a transformation of educational values, and John Dewey's thoughts on knowledge and the vocational are offered as a valuable source of ideas for effecting the desired shift in philosophical perspective.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Liberal VocationalismPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2002
- Difficulties Attending the New Vocationalism in the USAJournal of Philosophy of Education, 1991
- Liberal Education and the New Vocationalism: a progressive partnership?Oxford Review of Education, 1991
- Taking Care of Business: vocationalism, competence and the enterprise cultureEducational Studies, 1991
- On ‘Competence’Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1990
- The Use of Behavioural Objectives — A Moral Issue?Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1985
- Constant factors in the demand for technical education: 1860–1960British Journal of Educational Studies, 1966