Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model
Top Cited Papers
- 5 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Global Change Biology
- Vol. 9 (2) , 161-185
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x
Abstract
The Lund–Potsdam–Jena Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (LPJ) combines process‐based, large‐scale representations of terrestrial vegetation dynamics and land‐atmosphere carbon and water exchanges in a modular framework. Features include feedback through canopy conductance between photosynthesis and transpiration and interactive coupling between these ‘fast’ processes and other ecosystem processes including resource competition, tissue turnover, population dynamics, soil organic matter and litter dynamics and fire disturbance. Ten plants functional types (PFTs) are differentiated by physiological, morphological, phenological, bioclimatic and fire‐response attributes. Resource competition and differential responses to fire between PFTs influence their relative fractional cover from year to year. Photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and soil water dynamics are modelled on a daily time step, while vegetation structure and PFT population densities are updated annually.Simulations have been made over the industrial period both for specific sites where field measurements were available for model evaluation, and globally on a 0.5°° × 0.5°° grid. Modelled vegetation patterns are consistent with observations, including remotely sensed vegetation structure and phenology. Seasonal cycles of net ecosystem exchange and soil moisture compare well with local measurements. Global carbon exchange fields used as input to an atmospheric tracer transport model (TM2) provided a good fit to observed seasonal cycles of CO2concentration at all latitudes. Simulated inter‐annual variability of the global terrestrial carbon balance is in phase with and comparable in amplitude to observed variability in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2. Global terrestrial carbon and water cycle parameters (pool sizes and fluxes) lie within their accepted ranges. The model is being used to study past, present and future terrestrial ecosystem dynamics, biochemical and biophysical interactions between ecosystems and the atmosphere, and as a component of coupled Earth system models.Keywords
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Emission ScenariosGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 2001
- Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the Twentieth Century: Analyses of CO2, climate and land use effects with four process‐based ecosystem modelsGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 2001
- A canopy conductance and photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface schemeJournal of Hydrology, 1998
- Improving the behaviour of forest gap models along drought gradientsForest Ecology and Management, 1998
- A three‐dimensional synthesis study of δ18O in atmospheric CO2: 1. Surface fluxesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997
- An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamicsGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 1996
- Effects of plankton dynamics on seasonal carbon fluxes in an ocean general circulation modelGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 1996
- Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project:Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental‐scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doublingGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 1995
- On the contribution of CO2fertilization to the missing biospheric sinkGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 1995
- A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 speciesPlanta, 1980