Radiographic vs surgical size of renal tumours after partial nephrectomy
Open Access
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 85 (1) , 19-21
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00357.x
Abstract
Objective To compare the radiographic with the surgical size of renal tumours selected for partial nephrectomy. Patients and methods In 50 patients undergoing elective partial nephrectomy for renal carcinoma (31 men and 19 women, preoperative tumour size 1.5–5.2 cm) the maximum size of the renal tumour, as assessed from computed tomography (CT) before surgery, was compared with the tumour size at surgery. All patients had their renal artery temporarily occluded before surgery to shrink the kidney. Results After partial nephrectomy, the renal tumours were a mean of 0.63 cm smaller than the estimate from CT; tumours of 3.5 cm on CT were particularly reduced. Conclusion Incidentally discovered tumours on CT that are < 3.5 cm and favourably located are often selected for partial nephrectomy. If temporary vascular occlusion and surface hypothermia of the kidney causes shrinkage of most tumours of 3.5 cm, then surgeons might attempt partial nephrectomy in borderline cases, with a better chance of complete resection.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation.Radiology, 1996
- Partial nephrectomy for incidental renal cell carcinomaBritish Journal of Urology, 1994
- Nephron Sparing Surgery in Incidental Versus Suspected Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 1994
- Renal cell carcinoma: The size variableJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1993