The Pulfrich phenomenon and its alleviation with a neutral density filter.
Open Access
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 73 (12) , 1004-1008
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.73.12.1004
Abstract
A case is described in which a presumed vascular accident resulted in long-standing visual difficulties in both reading and the analysis of vectors of moving objects. Clinical examination revealed minimal right optic atrophy with a relative superior altitudinal visual field defect associated with a positive Pulfrich effect. A partial head turn to the right in association with paresis of saccades and pursuit eye movements to the right was also evident. Spectacles for distance which incorporated a neutral density filter before the left eye were prescribed. These practically eliminated the Pulfrich effect and alleviated the problems of vector analysis. A near correction was provided which incorporated prisms with bases to the right. This eliminated the reading difficulties. The visual problems experienced by patients suffering from a positive Pulfrich effect are described and discussed.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Apparent Path of a Pulfrich Target as a Function of the Slope of Its Plane of MotionOptometry and Vision Science, 1986
- Unusual visual symptomsSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1985
- Visual fatigue phenomenon and prescribing tinted lenses in patients with optic neuritis.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1984
- The pulfrich phenomenon with eye movementVision Research, 1983
- PULFRICH PENDULUM PHENOMENON IN PATIENTS WITH A HISTORY OF ACUTE OPTIC NEURITISActa Ophthalmologica, 1978
- Edge-light pupil cycle time.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1978
- USE OF THE PULFRICH PENDULUM FOR DETECTING ABNORMAL DELAY IN THE VISUAL PATHWAY IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSISBrain, 1975
- DIAGNOSTIC USES OF THE PULFRICH PHENOMENONThe Lancet, 1973
- DELAYED VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSE IN OPTIC NEURITISThe Lancet, 1972
- A NOTE ON PULFRICH'S PHENOMENON WITH A SUGGESTION ON ITS POSSIBLE CLINICAL IMPORTANCEBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 1925