Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for tactile air-puff stimulation in man
- 1 December 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Experimental Brain Research
- Vol. 73 (3) , 459-469
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00406602
Abstract
Brief air-puff stimuli were applied to the volar surface of the right hand to obtain both psychophysical and neurophysiological responses. The detection threshold (So) was first determined (0.56 kg · cm-2±0.20 kg · cm-2, mean±SD) and six levels of the stimulus intensities (So + 0.25 kg · cm-2, So + 1.25 kg · cm-2, So + 2.50 kg · cm-2, So + 3.75 kg · cm-2, So + 5.00 kg · cm-2, and So + 6.25 kg · cm-2) were employed for magnitude estimation using the stimulus level of So + 2.50 kg · cm-2 as the standard stimulus. The subject was asked to estimate numerically the series of stimulus intensities randomly presented. Cortical SEPs were recorded over the hand sensory area in response to a set of 120 air-puffs at the identical intensity level. Thus SEPs for six sets of stimulus intensities given in a random order were obtained from each subject. Six components (N20, P27, N35, P45, N60, and P75) were recorded within 100 ms following stimulation. It was seen that a simple power function with an exponent of 0.81 could be an adequate description of the stimulus-response function for magnitude estimation, as was also revealed by the high correlation coefficient (r=0.98). Similarly, stimulus-amplitude functions of different SEP components were well represented by straight lines in double logarithmic plots. The function of the early P27-N35 had the highest exponent (0.56) and also the highest correlation coefficient (r=0.91). Plotting subjective magnitude on the abscissa produced power functions similar to the stimulus-amplitude functions. However, higher correlations were observed for later components. The amplitudes of the four earlier components correlated with stimulus intensity when the effect of subjective magnitudes was removed. In contrast, the correlation between amplitudes and subjective magnitudes with stimulus intensity held constant was positive and significant for the later three components. These results may indicate that early SEP components represent neural coding of physical intensity while later components are more closely related to the subjective judgment of the stimulus.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trigeminal evoked potentials following brief air puff: Enhanced signal‐to‐noise ratioAnnals of Neurology, 1988
- Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and cortical single unit responses elicited by mechanical tactile stimuli in awake monkeysElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1984
- MICROSTIMULATION OF SINGLE TACTILE AFFERENTS FROM THE HUMAN HANDBrain, 1984
- Scalp topography of mechanically and electrically evoked somatosensory potentials in manElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1984
- Peripheral neural basis of tactile sensations in man: II. Characteristics of human mechanoreceptors in the hairy skin and correlations of their activity with tactile sensationsBrain Research, 1981
- Effect of stimulus intensity on short latency somatosensory evoked potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1979
- Quantitative neural and psychophysical data for cutaneous mechanoreceptor functionBrain Research, 1973
- Somatosensory evoked responses elicited by corneal and nostril air puff stimulationElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1972
- Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics.Psychological Bulletin, 1960
- Scales of apparent force.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959