Bayesian interpretation of trials: the example of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
Open Access
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 107 (1) , 3-10
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11571.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- When do obstetricians recommend delivery for a high-risk preterm growth-retarded fetus?European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1996
- A multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing elective and selective caesarean section for the delivery of the preterm breech infantBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Bayesian Approaches to Randomized TrialsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1994
- What is happening to caesarean section rates?The Lancet, 1993
- The cerebral palsies in Western Australia: Trends, 1968 to 1981American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The Changing Panorama of Cerebral Palsy in SwedenActa Paediatrica, 1984
- Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practicesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- The Increase in the Cesarean Birth RateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Two patterns of perinatal brain damage and their conditions of occurrenceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1972