Meeting the challenges of research governance
Open Access
- 9 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Rheumatology
- Vol. 44 (5) , 571-572
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh579
Abstract
There is a tangible sense of hostility being expressed among UK clinical researchers at present, directed at NHS Trusts’ implementation of the Department of Health's (DOH) Research Governance Framework (RGF) [1–4]. Researchers fear a decline in the UK's impressive research record due to the obstacles resulting from lengthy, complex, bureaucratic implementation procedures presented by research managers in NHS Trusts [5]. In addition, the UK health service has undergone radical organisational change, adding further complexities in the delivery of high quality research. Here we evaluate the impact of RGF particularly to multicentre clinical trials and contribute to the debate by sharing our personal experiences.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: Time has come to face research governanceBMJ, 2004
- Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: Research governance is about protection, not convenienceBMJ, 2004
- Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: Seeking a balance: response from the Department of Health and CORECBMJ, 2004
- Bureaucracy of ethics applicationsBMJ, 2004
- Research governance: a barrier to ethical research?QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Developing research management and governance capacity in primary care organizations: transferable learning from a qualitative evaluation of UK pilot sitesFamily Practice, 2004