Management and housing systems for layers – effects on welfare and production
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in World's Poultry Science Journal
- Vol. 61 (3) , 477-490
- https://doi.org/10.1079/wps200569
Abstract
Except for conventional cages, the most common housing systems for laying hens comprise deep litter, aviaries and more recently furnished cages. Layers in floor systems may also include out-door keeping. Furnished cages will be the only legal form of cages in the EU from 2012 (1999 EU-directive) but have as yet only been installed in significant numbers in Sweden and partly in Norway, Germany and Great Britain. Climate, feed, bird genotype, group size as well as the legal possibility to beak trim or to use certain medical treatments (mainly against endo- and ectoparasites) or not, are all conditions affecting results with different housing systems in different countries. Offering benefits to the bird as regards increase in behavioural repertoire as well as providing more space, all alternatives to conventional cages, require new orspecial knowledge of management. This is due to the fact that these systems often include higher potential risks in production and health of layers. This especially applies to non-cage systems (Petermann, 2003). The main issues to control in largergroup floorhousing are parasitic disorders, outbreak and spreading of cannibalistic pecking, increased feed intake, misplaced eggs, catching of spent hens and airquality (dust and ammonia levels). Many management practices to reduce some of these risks have been presented including rearing method, medication, vaccination, light intensity, genotype, feed composition, beak trimming and the use of spraying/fogging with water or oil as well as more frequent manure removal at closerintervals have been practised. Coming in a wide range of models and group sizes, the furnished cages attempt to combine the benefits and reduce the disadvantages of floorkeeping and conventional cages. The most developed models of furnished cages provide similar production results to conventional cages. However, differences still exists e.g. in egg quality traits between models. Design and location of nests, perches and litter are all important factors.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behaviour and welfare of individual laying hens in a non-cage systemBritish Poultry Science, 2003
- Effects of group size on performance, health and birds’ use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hensActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science, 1997
- Effects on Production, Health and Egg Quality of Varying Proportions of Wheat and Barley in Diets for Two Hybrids of Laying Hens Kept in Different Housing SystemsActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science, 1996
- Behaviour, health and integument of four hybrids of laying hens in modified and conventional cagesBritish Poultry Science, 1996
- Production and economic results of commercial flocks with white layers in aviary systems and battery cagesBritish Poultry Science, 1996
- The Edinburgh modified gage for laying hensBritish Poultry Science, 1995
- Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens housed in different husbandry systemsBritish Poultry Science, 1994
- Foot and Skeletal Disorders in Laying Hens: Effects of Perch Design, Hybrid, Housing System and Stocking DensityActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science, 1994
- Effect of catching method and lighting intensity on the prevalence of broken bones and on the ease of handling of end-of-lay hensPublished by Wiley ,1993
- A comparison of the behaviour and production of laying hens in experimental and conventional battery cagesApplied Animal Ethology, 1976