DOUBLE‐BLIND TRIAL OF CIMETIDINE VERSUS TRI‐POTASSIUM DI‐CITRATO BISMUTHATE IN CHRONIC DUODENAL ULCERATION
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 1 (7) , 363-364
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1981.tb135635.x
Abstract
Thirty‐seven patients with chronic duodenal ulceration were entered into an endoscopically controlled trial of cimetidine (Tagamet) versus tri‐potassium di‐citrato bismuthate (De‐Nol). At six weeks, 83% of patients taking cimetidine showed complete ulcer healing compared with 74% of patients taking tri‐potassium di‐citrato bismuthate. By ten weeks, the corresponding figures were 89% and 84% respectively. Symptomatic relief was similar in both treatment groups and, despite advice to the contrary, continued smoking and alcohol consumption did not appear to adversely affect healing. Both drugs appear to be equally effective in healing chronic duodenal ulcers.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- DOUBLE BLIND TRIAL COMPARING CIMETIDINE AND DE-NOL IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC DUODENAL ULCERAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1980
- A controlled study comparing cimetidine treatment to an intensive antacid regimen in the therapy of uncomplicated duodenal ulcerDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1979
- Comparison of two doses of cimetidine and placebo in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a multicentre trial.Gut, 1979
- Cimetidine versus intensive antacid therapy for duodenal ulcerGastroenterology, 1978
- Cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcerGastroenterology, 1978
- CIMETIDINE IN DUODENAL ULCER Controlled TrialThe Lancet, 1976
- Evaluation of colloidal bismuth (De-Nol) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer employing endoscopic selection and follow upGut, 1974