Newton on a Horse: A Critique of the Historiographies of ‘Technology’ and ‘Modernity’
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in History of Science
- Vol. 23 (4) , 351-378
- https://doi.org/10.1177/007327538502300402
Abstract
“In the absence of a guiding theory, problems of technology, like those of the most primitive fields of science, had to be solved empirically” (The new Cambridge modern history, concerning 1688–1751). “The striking fact is not merely that mathematical aptitude was diffused amongst large numbers of dons, divines, physicians, antiquaries and gentry …; but that it had become with many of them a passion, a supposed key to the knowledge of man, society and the universe … in the unspecialized imagination of the seventeenth century, the key that unlocked the secrets of the universe was essentially the same as that which might unlock the vaults of social wealth” (C. Wilson on England's apprenticeship 1603–1763).Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Science and the ‘Neolithic Paradox’History of Science, 1983
- Technical change and the ‘technology’ mythScandinavian Economic History Review, 1982
- THE BRITISH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTIONHistory, 1982
- THE MYTH OF A BRITISH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTIONHistory, 1981
- Characteristics of the Late Middle Ages in GermanyPublished by Springer Nature ,1972
- The scientific movement and the diffusion of scientific ideas, 1688–1751Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970
- THE SCIENTIFIC MOVEMENTPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1961
- The New Age of Technology, 1750-1900Economica, 1960