On-Site Artifact Analysis as an Alternative to Collection

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Artifact collection has become increasingly expensive, especially with respect to curation costs. Consequently, many government agencies as well as researchers have turned to an alternative, “on-site” analysis approach in which many analytical procedures usually reserved for the laboratory are conducted in the field. Using data gathered at an andesite quarry in eastern Nevada, we evaluate such an approach in terms of feasibility, reliability of results, and cost, as well as its impact on the surface archaeological record. Although we still believe that artifact collection is central to archaeological research, we argue that in circumstances where collection is not possible, a well-designed and systematically implemented on-site approach can yield reliable results, although not without some visible impact on the surface archaeological record.

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: