Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST): problems and need for modifications in paediatric oncology?
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 76 (907) , 433-436
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/15521966
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiologyPediatric Radiology, 2002
- Outstanding problems with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in breast cancerBreast Cancer, 2002
- The RECIST criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologistsThe British Journal of Radiology, 2001
- Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): New guidelinesMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 2001
- 99 m Tc-sulphur-colloid and heat-denatured 99 m Tc-labelled red cell scans demonstrating a giant intrapelvic spleen in a girl after splenectomyPediatric Radiology, 2001
- Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CTAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Will There Be Resistance to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Measuring Response in Solid Tumors: Unidimensional Versus Bidimensional MeasurementJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Volume doubling measurement of spherical and ellipsoidal tumorsMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1984