A Note on Cluster Analysis and Depression: Disparities in Results Produced by the Application of Different Clustering Methods
- 26 June 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 12 (2) , 99-102
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00048677809159600
Abstract
Cluster analysis is the most logically suited method for establishing psychiatric classifications. Different mathematical methods of clustering do, however, produce disparate results when applied to the same set of data. This study attempted to quantify the extent of such disparities, and found them to be marked. It was concluded that until cluster analysis has undergone further mathematical and statistical development, it should be used with caution.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex differences in response to a self‐rating depression scaleBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1977
- Cluster Analysis Applied to Symptom Ratings of Psychiatric Patients: An Evaluation of its Predictive AbilityThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- An Evaluation of Evidence on Depressive Classification and Some Alternative Suggestions from PhysiologyAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- Measuring Depressive Symptomatology in a General PopulationArchives of General Psychiatry, 1975
- The Use of Clustering Techniques for the Classification of Psychiatric PatientsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1973
- Cluster Analysis: A Brief Discussion of Some of the ProblemsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1972
- An Attempt at Validation of Traditional Psychiatric Syndromes by Cluster AnalysisThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1971
- Multivariate Statistical Methods and Classification ProblemsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1971
- ON THE METHODS AND THEORY OF CLUSTERINGMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1969
- The Nosology of Depression: The Endogenous-Reactive ConceptAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1968