Emergency Contraception — Expanding Opportunities for Primary Prevention
- 9 October 1997
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 337 (15) , 1078-1079
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199710093371510
Abstract
Unintended pregnancies are endemic in the United States, and the costs are huge.1 The traditional approach to this problem has been primary prevention (contraception), backed up by secondary prevention (induced abortion). For decades, emergency contraception has been ignored as a method of primary prevention.Although most U.S. obstetricians and gynecologists are aware of emergency contraception, they prescribe it infrequently. Only 1 percent of women in the United States report ever having used emergency contraception.2 In contrast, each year 2 to 3 percent of women of reproductive age have an induced abortion. Thus, the cumulative number of women who have had . . .Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergency Postcoital ContraceptionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Little knowledge and limited practice: Emergency contraceptive pills, the public, and the obstetrician-gynecologistObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Preventing unintended pregnancy: the cost-effectiveness of three methods of emergency contraception.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- Emergency contraception--parsimony and prevention in the medicine cabinet.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- Effect of post‐coital contraceptive methods on the endometrium and the menstrual cycleActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1996
- A prospective randomized comparison of levonorgestrel with the Yuzpe regimen in post-coital contraceptionHuman Reproduction, 1993