Perceptual Priming Versus Explicit Memory: Dissociable Neural Correlates at Encoding
- 15 May 2002
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Vol. 14 (4) , 578-592
- https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290260045828
Abstract
We addressed the hypothesis that perceptual priming and explicit memory have distinct neural correlates at encoding. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants studied visually presented words at deep versus shallow levels of processing (LOPs). The ERPs were sorted by whether or not participants later used studied words as completions to three-letter word stems in an intentional memory test, and by whether or not they indicated that these completions were remembered from the study list. Study trials from which words were later used and not remembered (primed trials) and study trials from which words were later used and remembered (remembered trials) were compared to study trials from which words were later not used (forgotten trials), in order to measure the ERP difference associated with later memory (DM effect). Primed trials involved an early (200–450 msec) centroparietal negative-going DM effect. Remembered trials involved a late (900–1200 msec) right frontal, positive-going DM effect regardless of LOP, as well as an earlier (600–800 msec) central, positive-going DM effect during shallow study processing only. All three DM effects differed topographically, and, in terms of their onset or duration, from the extended (600–1200 msec) fronto-central, positive-going shift for deep compared with shallow study processing. The results provide the first clear evidence that perceptual priming and explicit memory have distinct neural correlates at encoding, consistent with Tulving and Schacter's (1990) distinction between brain systems concerned with perceptual representation versus semantic and episodic memory. They also shed additional light on encoding processes associated with later explicit memory, by suggesting that brain processes influenced by LOP set the stage for other, at least partially separable, brain processes that are more directly related to encoding success.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impaired word-stem completion priming but intact perceptual identification priming with novel words: evidence from the amnesic patient H.M.Neuropsychologia, 1998
- Depth-of-processing effects on priming in stem completion: Tests of the voluntary-contamination, conceptual-processing, and lexical-processing hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1998
- An event-related potential study of word-stem cued recallCognitive Brain Research, 1996
- ERPs during study as a function of subsequent direct and indirect memory testing in young and old adultsCognitive Brain Research, 1996
- Cross-modality priming in stem completion reflects conscious memory, but not voluntary memoryPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1996
- Classifying Human Long-term Memory: Evidence from Converging DissociationsThe European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1996
- Intention and awareness in perceptual identification primingMemory & Cognition, 1994
- Involuntary conscious memory and the method of oppositionMemory, 1994
- Guideline ThirteenJournal Of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1994
- Can we have a distinctive theory of memory?Memory & Cognition, 1991