Impact of Worksite Health Promotion on Health Care Costs and Utilization
- 19 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 256 (23) , 3235-3240
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03380230059026
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between exposure to a comprehensive worksite health promotion program and health care costs and utilization. The experience of two groups of Johnson & Johnson employees (N=5192 and N=3259) exposed to Live for Life, a comprehensive program of health screens, life-style improvement programs, and worksite changes to support healthier life-styles, was compared with that of a control group (N=2955) over a five-year period. To account for baseline differences, analyses of covariance produced adjusted means for inpatient hospital costs, admissions, hospital days, outpatient costs, and other health costs. Mean annual inpatient cost increases were $43 and $42 for two Live for Life groups vs $76 for the non-Live for Life group. Live for Life groups also had lower rates of increase in hospital days and admissions. No significant differences were found for outpatient or other health care costs. (JAMA1986;256:3235-3240)Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Johnson & Johnson programPreventive Medicine, 1983
- Influence of an employee fitness programme upon fitness, productivity and absenteeismErgonomics, 1981
- Work-site treatment for obesityAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1980
- A Program of Heart Disease Intervention for Public EmployeesJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1978