Tripling Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest Via Early Defibrillation Without Traditional Education in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- 27 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 106 (9) , 1065-1070
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000028148.62305.69
Abstract
Background— Early defibrillation is the most important intervention affecting survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). To improve public access to early defibrillation, we established Piacenza Progetto Vita (PPV), the first system of out-of-hospital early defibrillation by first-responder volunteers. Methods and Results— The system serves a population of 173 114 residents in the Piacenza region of Italy. Equipment for the system comprises 39 semiautomatic external biphasic defibrillators (AEDs): 12 placed in high-risk locations, 12 in lay-staffed ambulances, and 15 in police cars; 1285 lay volunteers trained in use of the AED, without traditional education in cardiac pulmonary resuscitation, responded to all cases of suspected SCA, in coordination with the Emergency Medical System (EMS). During the first 22 months, 354 SCA occurred (72±12 years, 73% witnessed). The PPV volunteers treated 143 SCA cases (40.4%), with an EMS call-to-arrival time of 4.8±1.2 minutes (versus 6.2±2.3 minutes for EMS, P=0.05). Overall survival rate to hospital discharge was tripled from 3.3% (7 of 211) for EMS intervention to 10.5% (15 of 143) for PPV intervention (P=0.006). The survival rate for witnessed SCA was tripled by PPV: 15.5% versus 4.3% in the EMS-treated group (P=0.002). A “shockable” rhythm was present in 23.8% (34 of 143) of the PPV patients versus 15.6% (33 of 211) of the EMS patients (P=0.055). The survival rate from shockable dysrhythmias was higher for PPV versus EMS: 44.1% (15 of 34) versus 21.2% (7 of 33), P=0.046. The neurologically intact survival rate was higher in PPV-treated versus EMS-treated patients: 8.4% (12 of 143) versus 2.4% (5 of 211), P=0.009. Conclusions— Broad dissemination of AEDs for use by nonmedical volunteers enabled early defibrillation and tripled the survival rate for out-of-hospital SCA.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of Rapid Defibrillation by Security Officers after Cardiac Arrest in CasinosNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Chest Compression Alone or with Mouth-to-Mouth VentilationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Fatality outside hospital from acute coronary events in three British health districts, 1994-5BMJ, 1998
- Low‐Energy Impedance‐Compensating Biphasic Waveforms Terminate Ventricular Fibrillation at High Rates in Victims of Out‐of‐Hospital Cardiac ArrestJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1997
- High Discharge Survival Rate After Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation With Rapid Defibrillation by Police and ParamedicsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Paramedics and technicians are equally successful at managing cardiac arrest outside hospitalBMJ, 1995
- From concept to standard-of-care? Review of the clinical experience with automated external defibrillatorsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Ambulatory sudden cardiac death: Mechanisms of production of fatal arrhythmia on the basis of data from 157 casesAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Use of the Automatic External Defibrillator in the Management of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Early experiences with the portable automatic external defibrillator in the home and public placesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987